www.carm.org

HOME PAGE    

Is a bat a bird?
Leviticus 11:13-19

• (Leviticus 11:19) - "These, moreover, you shall detest among the birds; they are abhorrent, not to be eaten: the eagle and the vulture and the buzzard, ¹⁴and the kite and the falcon in its kind, ¹⁵every raven in its kind, 16 and the ostrich and the owl and the sea gull and the hawk in its kind, ¹⁷and the little owl and the cormorant and the great owl, ¹⁸and the white owl and the pelican and the carrion vulture, ¹⁹and the stork, the heron in its kinds, and the hoopoe, and the bat."

     In verse 13 Moses tells us about the birds and then he lists them out.  In verse 19 we see the bat is included in this list.  We know that a bat is not a bird.  Does this not mean that the Bible is incorrect?
     The Bible is not meant to be a scientific description of modern biological categories. Instead, it is often written from the perspective of what we see. In other words, it makes generic categorizations. In this case, the bat is categorized as a bird because like birds, it flies and is similar in size to most birds. If we did not know that it was a mammal, it would be natural to call it a bird. To the Hebrew of ancient times, calling it a bird was perfectly logical. But, in modern times with our science of being able to categorize animal species, we know that the bat is actually a mammal and not a bird.
     Also, we must be aware that it is modern science that has a different classification system than ancient times.  To the ancients, creatures such as a bat were considered birds since they categorized all flying animals as birds.  If that is the category that they used, then they were correct.  It is not an error.  It is a difference of categorization procedures.  The critic has imposed upon the ancient text a modern system of categorization and then said that the Bible is wrong. 

Return to Bible Contradictions - Genesis to Deuteronomy