| CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS & RESEARCH MINISTRY | www.carm.org |
|
|
Jesus cannot be God's son
This is naturally a
ridiculous scenario and is a false assumption. No where in the
Bible does it say that God had relations with anyone to produce a literal
son, nor has Christianity taught that God produced a son through any
physical act whatsoever. Such a thing is heretical. Nevertheless, the
Bible in numerous places calls Jesus the Son of God. But, it does not
mean that Jesus is the literal offspring of God. Old Testament usage of the term Son of God The term “son of God” is used in two main ways in the Old Testament. Neither way denotes any physical relation to God. Rather, the references deal with those who are under divine obedience to the call of God. It is used of Israel as a nation through the Exodus. Hosea 11:1 says, “When Israel was a youth I loved him, and out of Egypt I called My son.”1 It is also used in reference to angels. Job 1:6 says, "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.” Also, in Job 38:7 it says, "When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?" These are in reference to angels who are created beings and in no way implies literal dependency from God. New Testament usage of the term Son of God
The Term "Son of God"
occurs 47 times in the King James New Testament. In reference to
Jesus, it is a title as the heavenly, eternal Son who is equal to God the
Father (John
5:18-24). It is Jesus who fully
reveals the Father (Matt.
11:27). He is the exact
representation of the Father (Heb.
1:1-3), He possesses all
authority in heaven and earth (Matt.
28:18), and Jesus had glory
with the Father before the world was made (John
17:5).
_________________ |
|
Return to Islam
CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS
AND RESEARCH MINISTRY |