Because He was both
God and man (Col. 2:9; John 8:58 with Ex. 3:14).
The two natures
of Christ are why we have two types of scripture
concerning Jesus: those that seem to focus on His
divine-side, and those that seem to focus on His
human-side. The Jehovah's
Witnesses are simply
ignoring, or changing, the divine-side scriptures and
concentrating on those that describe His human-side.
Why did He say the Father was
greater than He (John 14:28)?
This is because His
position was different than that of God, not His nature.
Heb. 2:9 that Jesus
is made for a little while lower than the angels; that is,
when He became a man. The Father sent the Son (1 John 4:10).
Why did He say, "Why call
me good, only God is good?" (Luke 18:19)?
Jesus was confirming His own
deity because what He was doing was good.
Ask them, "Was Jesus
good?"
Why did Jesus say that He could
only do those things that He saw the Father do? (John 5:19).
This is an interesting verse
and it is one that proves the divinity of Christ, not that He
wasn't God.
Ask the Jehovah's Witness who
can do the same things God the Father can do? Could an angel?
Could a man? Of course not. Jesus, however, says He could do
whatever He saw the Father do. "I tell you the truth, the
Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his
Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also
does."
The answer to these and other
verses like them is that Jesus has two natures. Jesus was fully
man as well as fully God and as a man there will be verses that
show His humanity.
Witnessing Approaches using the
Bible.
John 1:1:
They translate as "In the beginning was the word and the
word was with God and the word was a god."
Ask if Satan is a
true god or a false God. The Jehovah's Witness will say a
false god. Then have them read aloud John 1:1 again in their
Bible and ask them if Jesus is a true god or a false one. If
he says "true god," he's in trouble because that
would make Jesus true God -- which the JW's do not believe. If he says
"false god," he's in trouble because that would make
Jesus a false God.
If Jesus is a god, then
doesn't that mean there are two gods? They often answer,
"Yes. But Jesus is not the Almighty God, He is only the
mighty god. And besides, there are those in the Bible who are
called gods but really aren't."
But, in Isaiah 10:21, God is called the Mighty God.
So if Jesus is not the Almighty God and only the mighty God,
then that makes Jesus God since GOD is called the mighty
God.
The problem with this
is that every God besides Jehovah is a false God. God says to
have no other God before Him (Exodus 20:3) because they are
not by nature gods (Gal. 4:8).
But, there are those who are called gods such as Exodus
7:1 where God says to Moses, "See, I make you as God to
Pharaoh, and your brother Aaron shall be your prophet,"
(NASB). God is not, of course, making Moses a god, but
He is saying that Moses will exhibit the power of God.
But Jesus is not said to be God in the same sense as Moses
was said to be "as" God.
Col. 1:15: Is used by the
Jehovah's Witnesses to say that Jesus is the first created thing.
This verse says, "He [Jesus] is the image of the invisible
God, the firstborn over all creation."
The Jehovah's
Witnesses maintain that "firstborn" means first
created. This cannot be the case because...
There is a Greek
word for "first created" and it is not used
here.
"First
born" is proto, "first," with tikto
"to bring forth, bear, produce."
There is no word
used in the New Testament for "first created."
However, if there were, the construction would be proto,
"first," with ktizo "to create." And
this is not the construction used in Col. 1:1
Firstborn can certainly mean
the first one born in a family. However, it can also mean
preeminence. For example:
In Jeremiah 31:9,
the firstborn title is attributed to one of the tribes of
northern Israel. "They will come with weeping;
they will pray as I bring them back. I will lead them
beside streams of water on a level path where they will
not stumble, because I am Israel's father, and Ephraim is
my firstborn son."
Understanding biblical culture
is important when interpreting Scripture. Firstborn was a
title, not only of the first born male, but also of
preeminence which is precisely what is occurring when it is
said that Jesus is the firstborn.
Col. 1:15-17 in the Jehovah's
Witness Bible has an addition of four words. Their version reads, "He
is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation;
because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens
and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no
matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or
authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for
him. Also, he is before all [other] things and by means of him all
[other] things were made to exist," (Their word
"[other]" is in their Bible with the brackets. They maintain
that they know it isn't in the original Greek Scriptures but the word
is implied and should be there.)
Instead of refuting the
bad translation, simply ask them if this means that Jesus created
everything. They will say yes. Review this and be very clear and
get them to admit that it was Jesus who created everything. Then
turn to...
Isaiah 44:24 "This
is what the LORD says -your Redeemer, who formed you in the
womb: I am the LORD, who has made all things, who alone
stretched out the heavens, who spread out the earth by
myself."
If Jesus created
everything, then why does it say that the Lord (Jehovah in the
Hebrew) did it by Himself?
The only answer is
that Jehovah is not simply the name of the Father, but that it
is the name of God the Trinity. Therefore, since Jesus is God
in flesh, it could be said that Jesus created all things and
that Jehovah did it alone.
You can also ask them to try to
read the section of verses and omit the word "other".
You will find it to be an interesting experience.
John 8:58 in
the Jehovah's Witness Bible says, "...Before Abraham came into
existence, I have been."
They have translated the
present tense ego eimi, in the Greek, into the perfect tense, I
have been. Though this can be done rarely in the New Testament, it
is not correct here because Jesus was quoting the O.T. verse of
Exodus 3:14 where God was telling Moses who He was: "God
said to Moses, ‘I AM WHO I AM. This is what you are to say to
the Israelites: "I AM has sent me to you."'"
Jesus was purposely using the divine title: I AM.
The Jehovah's Witness
won't agree. So ask him if Jesus was saying that He "had
been" before Abraham, then why does it say in the next verse
that the Jews pick up stones to kill him?
Additionally, about 250
years the Jews translated the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek. It is
called the Septuagint, also known as LXX. In the Septuagint Exodus
3:14 is translated in the Greek in a present tense, i.e., I AM...
The correct translation is, therefore, "Before Abraham
was, I AM."
If this verse should
really be translated as "I have been" then why did the
Jews want to kill Jesus? The answer is simple: They knew He was
claiming to be God, see the next example.
John 10:30-34 is a section of
verses where the Pharisees say that Jesus is making Himself out to be
God (v. 33).
"I and the
Father are one." Again the Jews
picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus said to them, "I
have shown you many great miracles from the Father. For which of
these do you stone me?" "We are not stoning you for any
of these," replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because
you, a mere man, claim to be God."
You can say, "See,
even the Jews knew He was claiming to be God. The Jehovah's
Witness (if he's quick enough) will say something like,
"Jesus wasn't God, the Jew's only thought that Jesus was
claiming to be God." Then you can say, "Oh, I see. Then
let me get this right. You agree with the Pharisees, Jesus wasn't
God? Is that correct? The Jehovah's Witness will not like it that
he agrees with a Pharisee.
Plurality in the Godhead
The following group of
scriptures strongly suggests a plurality within the Godhead. These
verses are translated correctly in the Jehovah's Witness Bible so
you can encourage them to use it. The NIV is not as literal in its
translation in the Amos verses, so I recommend using either the
King James or the New American Standard Bible when doing your own.
Gen. 1:26,
"Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image,
according to Our likeness . . . "
They will say
that angels are the ones who helped God make man. However,
there is no scriptural evidence for that. God is the only
creator.
You can also take
him to Col. 1:15-17 where it says that Jesus is the
creator of all things--including man.
Gen. 19:24, "Then the
LORD rained on Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the
LORD out of heaven."
Is this saying
there are two Lords, two Jehovah's?
Amos 4:10-11, "‘I
sent a plague among you after the manner of Egypt; I slew your
young men by the sword along with your captured horses, and I
made the stench of your camp rise up in your nostrils; yet you
have not returned to Me,' declares the LORD. ‘I overthrew
you as God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah . . . '"
Jehovah is the
one talking and He says, "I overthrew you as God
overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah..." Very
interesting.
Isaiah 44:6, "Thus
says the LORD, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the LORD
of hosts: ‘I am the first and I am the last, and there is no
God besides me . . . ‘" See also, Isaiah 48:1
If you are reading these
verses to a Jehovah's Witness he might say something like,
"Are you trying to show the Trinity from these
verses?" You can then say, "You got the Trinity out
of these? That's very interesting."
These verses and others are
more fully developed in The
Plurality Study, which is a powerful tool for witnessing
to the Witnesses.
John 20:25 says,
"The other disciples therefore were saying to him, ‘We have
seen the Lord!' But he said to them, ‘Unless I shall see in His
hands the imprint of the nails, and put my finger into the place of
the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe'"
(NASB).
The Jehovah's Witnesses
deny that Jesus was crucified on a cross. They say it happened on
a torture stake where His wrists were put together over His head
and a single nail was put through both. If that is true, then why
does Thomas say "Unless I shall see in His hands the
imprint of the nails..." In the Greek the word used here
for "nails", helos, is in the plural. Therefore, there
was more than one nail used in the hands of the crucifixion of
Christ.
First and Last
How many firsts and lasts
are there? In the Bible God is called the first and last and so is
Jesus. Since God says there is no God apart from Him and Jesus and
God are both addressed by the same title, then that poses a
problem for the Jehovah's Witness.
Isaiah 44:6,
"This is what the LORD says -Israel's King and Redeemer,
the LORD Almighty: I am the first and I am the last; apart
from me there is no God."
Revelation 1:8,
"I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God,
"who is, and who was, and who is to come, the
Almighty."
Revelation 1:17-18, "When
I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed
his right hand on me and said: "Do not be afraid. I am
the First and the Last. I am the Living One; I was dead, and
behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of
death and Hades."
Obviously, Rev.
1:17-18 can only refer to Jesus.
Revelation 22:12-13, "Behold,
I am coming soon! My reward is with me, and I will give to
everyone according to what he has done. I am the Alpha and the
Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the
End."
Here, both the
"Alpha and the Omega" and the "First and
the Last" are said to be one and the same.
Also, at this
point go to Titus 2:13 where it says that Jesus is the one
who is coming soon, therefore, Jesus and Jehovah are the
same.
The Holy Spirit
Jehovah's Witnesses teach
that the Holy Spirit is an active force like radar. They deny that
He is alive, that He is a person. This is, of course, because they
deny the Trinity. Yet, if the Holy Spirit is simply a force
then...
Why is He called God
(Acts 5:3-5)?
How is it that He can
teach (John 14:26)?
How can He be
blasphemed (Matt. 12:31,32)?
How can be the one
who comforts (Acts 9:31)?
How is it possible
for Him to speak (Acts 28:25)?
How then can He be
resisted (Acts 7:51)?
How can He be grieved
(Eph. 4:30)?
How can He help us in
our weaknesses (Rom. 8:26)?
If the Holy Spirit is a force,
then how is it possible that the above mentioned phenomena are
attributed to Him? A force doesn't speak, teach, comfort, etc.
Nor can you blaspheme against a
force.
The Resurrection of Jesus
The Jehovah's Witnesses
deny the physical resurrection of Jesus. They say that if the
sacrifice of Jesus were real then the body had to stay in the
grave. They say that He rose in a spirit body. This body was a
manifestation similar to the way angels manifested themselves in
the Old Testament.
The problem with
their view is that the angels were not incarnated. Jesus
became a man by birth, therefore, He had a real, physical
body, a permanent body. In fact, right now, Jesus is in heaven
in the form of a man. He still has two natures, God and man,
and will eternally be that.
For scriptural proof of Jesus
being raised in the same body He died in, consider the following
verses.
In John 2:19-22
before the crucifixion Jesus said, "Destroy this
temple and in three days I will raise it up...He was speaking
of the temple of His body." Since Jesus said He would
raise the same body He died in, then it must be true.
This last verse
is worth focusing on. Remember, Jesus said He would be the
one to raise His body. So, it must be true.
John 20:27 -(to Thomas) "reach
your finger...and put it into My side..."
If Jesus were not
raised from the dead, then why did He have a physical
body.
They will reply that it
was a temporary body materialized so the apostles would
believe that He was raised. Yet, this is not what Jesus
said in John 2:19-22. He said He would raise His
very body.
Luke 24:39 - "a spirit
does not have flesh and bones as you see I have."
Jesus said that
He had "flesh and bones" not "flesh and
blood." This is important because flesh and blood
cannot inherit the kingdom of God (1 Cor. 15:50). The
blood of Jesus was the sacrifice for sin (Rom. 5:9). It is
the blood that cleanses us of our sin (Heb. 9:22).
The blood of
Jesus was shed on the cross and so, most probably, Jesus
doesn't have any functioning blood in His body.
Similarities between the Jehovah's
Witnesses and the Pharisees:
Both deny the Trinity and
the Deity of Christ
Both deny the physical
resurrection of Christ and salvation by grace alone.