What
is a Third Day church?
Third Day theology is a prophetic movement
within Christianity that focuses on biblical scriptures that mention
the phrase "third day" and seeks to apply what it sees are the benefits and promises
of those scriptures for our time. Adherents claim that the third
day is now, the third thousand years of Christ's reign. Sequentially, the
third day follows the first and second days. The first day is
where we leave the old ways behind. The second day is the
process of holding onto the promises of God that have not yet been
fulfilled. Day three is the victory and receiving of the
promises of God with an emphasis on personal development and spiritual
improvement. Therefore, a third day church is a church that
is looking for new ways to "do church" by leaving the old
ways and moving onto the new ones that will be revealed, allegedly, by
the Holy Spirit unto greater spiritual growth and prosperity. Generally,
Third Day Churches are charismatic, pentecostal, emphasize present day
apostles, prophets, prophetic utterances, and approve of women
pastors.
Some examples of scriptures used in Third Day
Churches and how they are applied is as follows:
-
Gen. 22:4,
"Then on the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw
the place afar off."
-
The context is
Abraham offering Isaac. Prophetically, God provided the
Son, therefore, the church will see an great influx of
believes.
-
Ezra 6:15
- "And this house was finished on the third day of the
month Adar, which was in the sixth year of the reign of Darius the
king."
-
John 2:1,
"And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of
Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there."
Is this biblical?
I do believe in patterns in the Bible and at first was intrigued by
the "third day" idea. However, the "third day
theme" of blessing isn't biblically consistent with the use of
the phrase throughout Scripture. Because it isn't, in order to
maintain their distinction and emphasis, third day churches must read
into the text more than they read out of it. This is a serious problem
and should be abandoned by the Christian church. Compare the following verses with
those above as proof that "third day" scriptures are not
always about God blessing the church.
-
Gen. 34:25, "And
it came to pass on the third day, when they were sore, that two of
the sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, Dinah's brethren, took each
man his sword, and came upon the city boldly, and slew all the
males."
-
Gen. 40:20, "And
it came to pass the third day, [which was] Pharaoh's birthday,
that he made a feast unto all his servants: and he lifted up the
head of the chief butler and of the chief baker among his
servants."
-
Lev.
7:18, "And if
[any] of the flesh of the sacrifice of his peace
offerings be eaten at all on the third day,
it shall not be accepted, neither shall it be imputed
unto him that offereth it: it shall be an abomination,
and the soul that eateth of it shall bear his
iniquity."
-
1 Sam. 30:1, "And
it came to pass, when David and his men were come to Ziklag on the
third day, that the Amalekites had invaded the south, and Ziklag,
and smitten Ziklag, and burned it with fire."
-
See
also, Lev. 19:6, 7; Num 7:24; Num. 19:12, 19, 20;
Num. 31:19; Judg 20:30; 1 Kings 12:12, etc., which
do not support the "new works of God"
idea that third day churches teach.
As you can see, these scriptures don't support the "new
works of God" idea. In fact, they have nothing to do with
the New Testament church at all and yet contain the phrase "third
day." Therefore, quite simply, the pattern looked for is
not valid. Perhaps I am being nit-picky, but when an
emphasis to "doing church," is based upon a subjective observation of a group of
scriptures that are not consistent with the proposed idea, I become rather
suspicious -- and so should the pastors involved.
Furthermore, the idea that the "third
day" corresponds to the third millennium is without biblical
warrant. It is based on a misuse of the following
scripture: "But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one
thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a
thousand years as one day," (2 Pet. 3:8). Note that the
verse does not say that with the Lord a thousand years is a day
and vice versa, but that it is as a day. It is not a
specific correlation of one day equals 1000 years, but a figurative
use of the word "thousand" to express the idea that God is
beyond time.
Additionally, the notion that the third millennium
of Christ's rule is commenced does not take into account the fact that
Jesus did not rise from the dead and ascend until A.D. 33 (give or
take). We have another 30 years or so before the real third millennium
arrives since Christ's victory on the cross. The emphasis in
biblical theology is the cross, not the birth of Christ, though it is,
of course, important. Rather, the cross is where Jesus bore our
sins (1 Pet. 2:24). This is the reason He came to us and it is
the center of biblical theology. The charismatic and pentecostal
groups often seek experience as a central focus rather than the
cross. They often want new experiences, new revelations, new
ideas, etc., to tickle their fancies. I have nothing against new
ideas and experiences, but they must be consistent with biblical revelation
and completely subject to it. I do not believe the "third
day" emphasis is. Therefore, it should be dismissed.
Please understand that biblically I support the
continuation of the spiritual gifts and the movement of the Holy
Spirit upon and within His people, even prophetically. But, any
such movement in the Christian church must be saturated in clear
biblical truth, not subjective interpretations which lend themselves
to more "charismania." Unfortunately, it is the
non-doctrinally sound and over-emotionalism that has led to so many
errors in the charismatic circles. Such errors include barking
like dogs when the Holy Spirit allegedly comes over them, uncontrolled
laughter, being slain in the Spirit, entire churches speaking in
tongues simultaneously, etc. These things have brought ridicule
upon the name of Christ by unbelievers and this very thing is warned
against by Paul in 1 Cor. 14 when he discusses the proper place of
charismatic experiences. The Bible teaches order and decency in
contradiction to many of the experiences of charismatic
churches.
I am not trying to be a kill joy nor am
I saying that those involved in it are not Christian. On the
contrary. I truly hope that those who emphasis "third day" scriptures,
are used by the Lord to bring glory to Him and to expand the church of
God, in spite of this theological "error." In all
things we must remain biblically dedicated and subject all experiences
and ideas to God's word no matter what we hope to experience or
accomplish.
Return to the
Religious
Movements List
CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS
AND RESEARCH MINISTRY
Home | Contact | Newsletter |
Publications |
Donations | Copying and Linking
©
Matthew J. Slick, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003
|