| CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS & RESEARCH MINISTRY | www.carm.org |
|
From Christadelphianism to Christianity My decision to leave Christadelphianism did not come lightly. It took many years for everything to finally come to a head. I got sucked into this cult when I was a teenager when I didn’t know any better, and was involved with them for 33 years of my life. During that course of time, I had made several close friends, and I knew many very nice people, especially from the first ecclesia. I still think about them every single day, and I honestly wish I could have a relationship with them, but I can’t. So now I’m starting over, and it will take a while before I can make close friends again.While I was in the cult, the focus was on academic, heady Bible knowledge, correct theology and study of prophecy, than on holy living or having a personal relationship with Christ. “Wrong” doctrine was reckoned as much a sin as an immoral lifestyle, and in some places was dealt with in the same way. "Status" of certain individuals came through intellectual superiority in absorbing and teaching complicated theological concepts, and often I found it boring to listen to them. I took part in looking up to them in order to fit in. But I could tell they were enjoying the spotlight, there was always this smug smile on their faces, and they seemed to be the most outspoken and opinionated about a lot of things. This was especially evident in Bible Schools, which were held during the summer months. Others, who were judged to be less intellectual, were generally left out in the cold. I was one of these people, and felt ostracized or that I could never measure up to the rest of them. It was this way in my second ecclesia more than the first. A further major problem was too much focus on Christ’s return and the Kingdom of the future age as the main content of the Gospel. The Christadelphians as a whole don’t believe or accept the Rapture as part of prophecy. And if you don’t believe in the concept of the Rapture, then you also don’t accept the graphic descriptions in the Revelation regarding the Antichrist and the Great Tribulation. They don’t have a clue, they just look down on it with contempt and think it’s funny. There was little real understanding of the relevance of Jesus to simple daily living. There was a feeling of dissatisfaction with the religion, leaving some of us feeling defeated in life, and without peace, purpose, or hope. And I saw people I knew and liked drift away, some into a sinful lifestyle. The ecclesia had no Good News to offer this situation, no assurance of salvation, no promise of victory over sin; and no power to make it real. We had no answers for the desperate heart needs of the downtrodden, to whom Jesus turned with compassion, love and power in every opportunity. There was a definite coldness and rigid legalism in the ecclesias, and a certain phoniness at Bible Schools. I never really enjoyed myself at those events, and decided to stop going to them when I got older. All I had to fall back on was cultic tradition and my own feeble, human efforts. And that won’t give a person a prayer of a chance to make it eternally. It’s a hopeless situation. I have heard about many who have simply (and secretly) given up, too afraid or embarrassed to admit it, forced to remain in the system by family and peer group pressures, sitting on the fence not knowing what to do. My church peer group was anything but spiritual. Our most important activities revolved around evangelizing ourselves, over and over through endless conversations and Sunday School classes, that we alone had "THE TRUTH," although we didn’t do a whole lot of evangelizing to the outside world. Everyone else outside of Christadelphianism is a liar, apostate, corrupt, and all the rest. If that’s true, then why do so many of these groups all claim the same thing? I always wondered that but never asked the question. The Christadelphian idea of the Gospel was preaching the Land of Canaan for the salvation of sinners, instead of preaching Jesus Christ and Him crucified. They don’t believe you can have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and walk intimately with Him. That seems to be a foreign concept to them. But I have found it is a biblical one, because once you recognize the Atonement of Jesus as your substitute and accept Him as your personal savior, the SIN ISSUE between Holy God and Sinful Man has been dealt with. Therefore, you become WASHED IN HIS BLOOD, which paves the way for a personal relationship and to be reconciled to Him. (Rev. 7:14; Romans 3:23-25; Titus 3:4-7) To me, this is a most precious gift, and unfortunately, one that the Christadelphians do not comprehend, though I earnestly wish they did. In all my years as a Christadelphian, it was all head knowledge and church (cult) tradition. There was rarely, if ever, discussions on or the practice of compassion, forgiveness, love, healing, nurturing, helping, caring, etc.; though there were a few exceptions. That was considered a waste of time for the most part. Some of them seemed to use the Bible as a weapon to combat one another within the ecclesia and of course, those outside. I believe that comes from the “Us against them” Persecution Complex. They think everyone’s out to get them, and are so arrogant to think that only THEY have a monopoly on The Truth in the whole wide world, so they go on the defensive with outsiders. That’s how it is. I was that way myself when I was a Christadelphian. It’s so typically cultic and I didn’t know any better. But we are instructed to be gentle in our dealings with people, and to give a reason for the hope that is in us. (1Pet. 3:15) I could see many of them were full of pride and arrogance, having no tolerance or compassion for anyone who might be struggling with personal difficulties or confusion over certain issues. They laughed at and ridiculed outsiders with smug self-righteousness. There was no love or warmth, unless you were a member of a certain “class” or a family. Most of the ecclesia meetings are fairly small, and they mainly comprise of a few family clans and a few stragglers who didn’t fall into any of these categories. The majority of Christadelphians are born into it and a few are recruited or come into it through a member. Some marry into Christadelphianism. Almost every ecclesia that I know of has very strict rules concerning marriage. No one should marry anyone unless he or she is a Christadelphian, and it doesn’t matter how bad or good the person is. I experienced this in my own life. In fact, my in-laws hated me simply because I was from an ecclesia they had a falling out with decades earlier! They refused to come to the wedding for that reason. The rule is, you must marry someone within your own cultic system no matter what; and anyone else is considered an outsider, an unbeliever, an alien to be treated with cynicism and suspicion. Depending on the individual ecclesia, it may take YEARS before a person is accepted by the group, and they are never really accepted until the person relents or is indoctrinated and is baptized into the cult. So it makes for a very awkward and difficult situation at times. It is understandable that we should not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers, but I believe Christadelphians take it to an extreme and make it a very rigid cultic practice. There is even strife and division in some ecclesias over this, and it’s becoming more of a problem. What led to the decision to change was a long-time dissatisfaction of the group as a whole, and also I knew there was something wrong so I had to find out what it was. I set out to do some investigating into doctrinal issues as well as look into the background of the founder. The Christadelphians couldn’t give me any satisfactory answers to the doctrinal questions I had (I know now it’s because they REALLY DON’T KNOW); and if I dared to ask the wrong questions, I would be pegged and marked as an “apostate” or worse. The unwritten rule was “you don’t question the way we do things or the doctrines we believe”, if you do then you will be scorned, ridiculed or put on the defensive. I was fed up listening to and witnessing all the garbage about the Division that exists between fellowships as well as the constant gossiping, backstabbing and legalism within the individual ecclesia. I was also tired of the Pharisaical, contemptuous attitudes by some of the members who had dominant, egotistical personalities. It upset me and I felt like a victim (and I probably was). I figured there had to be a better faith than this, so I decided to distance myself from the whole thing and find out what I could on my own. In the process of my personal research on Christadelphianism, I uncovered very revealing information, not only about the founder but all the doctrinal issues I had questions about for so long. First of all, I read several unfavorable articles about the founder, John Thomas, and about Christadelphians in general. One article in particular was written by an evangelist and journalist who knew him personally. It was a graphic report about his unstable and deceptive character, as well as Robert Roberts, called “The History and Mystery of Christadelphianism”. To read the article yourself, you can go to We believe in the bodily resurrection of both the saved and the lost; the saved to be raised at the first resurrection to receive their glorified bodies and to be forever with the Lord; the lost to be raised at least 1,000 years later only to face the judgment of the Great White Throne and to be cast into the lake of fire forever. (1 Cor. 15:51-59; 1 Thes. 4:13-18; John 5:28-29; Rev. 20: 5,6, 11-15).
Conclusion It is my earnest hope and desire that those of you who follow the Christadelphian religion, especially, will see yourselves in my testimony and will have the courage to face the truth to make a change for the better. If you’ve been sitting on the fence or disenchanted with the whole thing and wondering what to do – take heart, it can be done. Which is better, following some twisted, dead religion that was founded by a deceptive and now-dead man, or following the Living, Eternal Lord of Life based on the Holy Bible ALONE? For me, I will choose to follow the Lord and ONLY Him. No one else cuts it. Lynette Schaefer June, 2001
|
Return to the Testimonies Page |